The Lost World of John H. Walton

•March 29, 2015 • 2 Comments

John H. WaltonLydia McGrew from What’s Wrong with the World (an excellent blog, by the way) has done a three part review of John H. Walton’s The Lost World of Adam and Eve and a review of The Lost World of Genesis One.  They are well worth your time, clear, helpful, faithful to Scripture, well reasoned.  Let me know what you think.

The Lost World of Genesis One

The Lost World of Adam and Eve, part 1

The Lost World of Adam and Eve, part 2

The Lost World of Adam and Eve, part 3

C.M. Granger

Beware the Grid: Some Thoughts on Intellectual Blind Spots

•March 9, 2015 • 4 Comments

Wow, it’s been over two months since my last post. Just the other day I was thinking it had only been a few weeks…

I’d like to comment on a post by a pastor and apologist I highly respect named James R. White of Alpha and Omega ministries. I don’t always agree with him, but I appreciate his ministry and apologetic work, particularly in the area of theological debate.

On the Reformed Baptist Fellowship website he published a post entitledWhy I Am So Thankful to be a Reformed Baptist” .  Now, there’s nothing wrong with being thankful to be a part of your church, association, or denomination.  I have no problem with that on the surface of it.  In the post he mentions the following reasons for being so thankful:

1.  He gets to meet and minister with some of the best preachers and teachers he knows of.

2.  He has the honor and privilege of ministering in sister churches all across the landscape, and is encouraged by the spirit of unity and faith.

3.  But the main reason he cites as being thankful for being a Reformed Baptist is the work the Lord has called him to in apologetics, that is, in providing a reasoned defense of the faith to those who are skeptical of it or who outright oppose it.

He then goes on to list several false religions and cults, such as Islam, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Oneness Pentacostalism, etc. and how he has defended Christian orthodoxy with regard to the Trinity, the inspiration and authority of the Bible, the Crucifixion, the person and work of Christ, all because of the consistency of “our faith”.  All well and good, except….such Christian orthodoxy is not the product of a small sliver of Baptist churches who designate themselves to be “reformed”.  In fact, I daresay all of these doctrinal truths were ironed out long before independent Particular or Reformed Baptist churches came to the fore, or the 1689 2nd London Baptist COF was written.

Therefore, shouldn’t the title of the post simply be “Why I Am So Thankful to be a Christian”?  I don’t see what being a Reformed Baptist has to do with this, do you?

But then Dr. White brings his post to a conclusion by stating the following:

“So the next time you eye the big fancy church down the road on your way to your Reformed Baptist church, consider this:  the value of the consistency of divine truth, the treasure of having a firm foundation upon which to live a God-honoring life, is truly priceless.”

Did you note how he went from cults and false religions to the “big fancy church” down the street?  How are these connected?  Isn’t the big fancy church down the street a Christian congregation of blood-bought sinners redeemed by grace, just like the small Reformed Baptist church?  Does such a church not have the body of truth Dr. White has been so thankful to defend against its opponents?  This kind of statement is indicative of a certain mindset among some RB churches and brethren that needs to be repented of.  A cloak of suspicion need not be cast upon other churches or ministries, nor does the Reformed Baptist need to be held up as the one with a corner on the truth.

I don’t mean to malign Dr. White’s motives, I’m sure he was attempting to encourage his brothers and sisters in Christ who serve the Lord in RB churches.  I simply want to point out how an unhealthy mindset can take advantage of intellectual blind spots.  Keep defending the faith, Dr. White, only do so as a thankful Christian!

C.M. Granger

Total Depravity and Conditional Immortality

•January 5, 2015 • 2 Comments

Conditional immortality (or annihilationism) is a heterodox belief which states that obtaining immortality is based upon a condition, namely believing the gospel.  Therefore, unbelievers don’t suffer eternally in hell for their sin but rather (after a time of punishment) cease to exist.  Atheists generally believe that at death consciousness dissolves and individual persons cease to exist as well.  Conditional immortality basically affirms this atheistic belief.

I’m not going to make an extended argument here for what has been called the traditional view of hell.  My only purpose is to state that before I believed the gospel, I was told by someone that if I didn’t believe it I would die and be eternally extinguished.  My very first thought was, “Who cares?  I won’t exist.  I can have my sin and (someday in the future) die and go to sleep forever.”

In other words, the doctrine of conditional immortality doesn’t properly take into account man’s total depravity.  Fear of death is a weak motivation for repentance.  Fear of hell, that’s quite another motivation.

 

C.M. Granger

 

Resolution # 1

•January 4, 2015 • Leave a Comment

The fourth book of the Torah (first five books of the Bible) is Numbers. The Hebrew title for Numbers is, “And He said.” It is the first two words of the Hebrew text. It gives us a better key to unlock the treasures in this Old Testament book. The children of Israel will go through the wilderness, but they would not be alone – God promised that his real and visible presence would be right there in the middle of the people. The Israelites could not depend on the food and water that was so readily available in Egypt; they had to rely on God and His Word. The book of Numbers is all about God’s Instructions in the wilderness. God tested His people and reminded them that His people will live by faith and they must live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God. Lesson for then; Lesson for now! Here is a “spiritual” New Year’s Resolution: Let’s resolve to live our lives by the teachings found in the Bible.
What do you think some of the roadblocks will be in 2015?

Brian (Disciple of Christ)

Some Post-Christmas Thoughts on the Love of God in the Incarnation

•December 30, 2014 • 4 Comments

Nativity (8) In some Reformed circles there’s a debate about whether a Christian should ever tell unbelievers that God loves them. The argument goes something like this, “We never see an example of Jesus or Paul, or any other NT writer, using such language when preaching or speaking to unbelievers”. I don’t know that this assertion establishes the position, and I don’t pretend the argument isn’t more nuanced than this. However, I also don’t believe it to be true primarily because of the Incarnation. Jesus was born, God’s Son was given. The gospel is “good news”, and part of that good news is that God does love you.

Some of my brothers and sisters in the faith will be quick to point out that God doesn’t really love unbelievers because if He did, they would become believers. In other words, the only love that counts is God’s redeeming love. Making such a distinction, I think, is unhelpful theologizing (that might not be an actual word, but it conveys what I’m trying to get across). If there is redeeming love, can you explain to me what non-redeeming love is, exactly? It can’t simply be good will. Good will is not love in the Scriptural sense. I’m open to correction though, so let me hear it in the combox if you think I’m mistaken. Let’s consider an example in Scripture of Jesus loving an unbeliever:

“And as He was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to Him and knelt before Him, and began asking Him, ‘Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone. You know the commandments, Do Not Murder, Do Not Commit Adultery, Do Not Steal, Do Not Bear False Witness, Do Not Defraud, Honor Your Father and Mother.’ And he said to Him, ‘Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.’ And looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him, and said to him, ‘One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess, and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.’ Mark 10:17-21

Now, there’s no indication in the text that the Rich Young Ruler ever did follow Christ. Some will make that assertion because “Jesus felt a love for him”, and if that is so, he must have been saved later because, well, Jesus only loves those whom He saves. If we go no further than the text, we cannot make that assumption. It says that Jesus felt a love for him (as a total aside, this also disproves the notion that love is not a feeling. It’s much more than that, but it definitely is a feeling. But I digress…).

In my opinion, it’s biblical to tell unbelievers that God loves them and that He invites them to come to Him in the gospel of His Son. The gospel is not simply a regal command to “repent and believe”, but a fatherly pleading and exhortation to do so. I think the Incarnation itself (among other things, such as the fact that “God is love”) establishes this. Don’t miss this important aspect of the First Advent, nor doubt whether or not it’s pleasing to our heavenly Father if you tell sinners He loves them. The failure to express God’s love when we share the gospel may be a primary reason our evangelism is not particularly winsome or fruitful. At least consider the possibility…

C.M. Granger

Beware of M&M!!!

•December 23, 2014 • 4 Comments

All the congregation of the people of Israel moved on from the wilderness of Sin by stages, according to the commandment of the Lord, and camped at Rephidim, but there was no water for the people to drink. 2 Therefore the people quarreled with Moses and said, “Give us water to drink.” And Moses said to them, “Why do you quarrel with me? Why do you test the Lord?” 3 But the people thirsted there for water, and the people grumbled against Moses and said, “Why did you bring us up out of Egypt, to kill us and our children and our livestock with thirst?” 4 So Moses cried to the Lord, “What shall I do with this people? They are almost ready to stone me.” 5 And the Lord said to Moses, “Pass on before the people, taking with you some of the elders of Israel, and take in your hand the staff with which you struck the Nile, and go. 6 Behold, I will stand before you there on the rock at Horeb, and you shall strike the rock, and water shall come out of it, and the people will drink.” And Moses did so, in the sight of the elders of Israel. 7 And he called the name of the place Massah[a] and Meribah,[b] because of the quarreling of the people of Israel, and because they tested the Lord by saying, “Is the Lord among us or not?” Exodus 17:1-7 (ESV)

 
There can be seasons in our life when things just don’t ‘go well’ for us. Other times it could just be horrible. In those times we must remember to avoid M & M’s. For those who read the Old Testament often, this may be a familiar story – for those who don’t, it may seem like a strange story, but many may be hard-pressed to see how it has any relevance in our modern society. Let us look a little closer.
Exodus 17 tells us that all the Israelites camped at Rephidim, but there was no water for the people to drink. This was a tough time for the Israelites and they quarreled with Moses. They even took it a step further and questioned whether the Lord was among them or not. This was sin. They grumbled and tested the Lord. When things were rough and didn’t go their way, they quarreled against their God-appointed leader and tested the Lord. Moses renamed that place Massah and Meribah. Those two Hebrew words mean, Testing and Quarreling. Every time anyone would pass through that place, they will recall how the Israelites grumbled against their leader and tested the Lord. Are there lessons for us from that story? Absolutely. For me, when things don’t go my way, I tend to grumble against those who have authority over me. When I hurt emotionally and physically, I am often tempted to question God’s care for me, or worse, “Does He really know what’s best for me?” This is sin. BUT God has a remedy for sin – His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. He has provided Jesus as our Savior, and the Holy Spirit as our Comforter. Salvation has been secured in Christ. Our part is now to resist the desire for evil and avoid Massah and Meribah {testing & quarreling}. This season enjoy your little M & M candies, they’re not poisonous, but let those little red, yellow, brown, orange, green and blue candies remind us that there is an M&M that is poisonous to our souls, and we must avoid it all cost!

Brian Spivey D.O.C.

More from Murray, On the Uniqueness of Scripture

•December 13, 2014 • 3 Comments

“Scripture is unique, not because it takes the place of God, nor the place of Christ, but because of its relationship to God, to Christ, and to the Holy Spirit. It is unique because it is the only way whereby we come into relationship to God in the redemptive revelation of his grace, and the only way whereby Christ in the uniqueness that belongs to him as the Son of God incarnate, as the crucified, risen, and ascended Redeemer, comes within the orbit of our knowledge, faith, experience, and hope. We have no encounter with God, with Christ, and with the Holy Spirit in terms of saving and redeeming grace apart from Scripture. It is the only revelation to us of God’s redemptive will. That is its uniqueness.

Here then is the conclusion proceeding from its uniqueness, its incomparable singularity in the situation that is ours in God’s providence. If we do not accept its verdict respecting its own character or quality, we have no warrant to accept its verdict respecting anything else. If its witness respecting itself is not authentic, then by what warrant may we accept its witness on other matters? By reason of what Scripture is and means in the whole compass of Christian faith and hope we are shut up to what Scripture teaches respecting its origin, character, and authority.”

John Murray–Collected Writings, Vol. 1, The Infallibility of Scripture, pg. 12

I’ve been reading Murray lately, excellent, profound, wise.

In two small paragraphs he dismantles postmodern views of Scripture. I haven’t heard or read a satisfactory response to Murray’s points here, though many books have been written on the subject.

C.M. Granger

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 515 other followers